Talk:M-17 (Michigan highway)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 19:54, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS): 
- In the lead, you say "The changes made to the highways in Washtenaw County even spawned BUS M-17, a business loop for 11 years." Why is it "even"? "Even" makes it sound like this was an unusual phenomenon... And maybe say a business loop between x year and y year, rather than for 11 years.
- In the Route description section, you say "West of this cloverleaf interchange, Washtenaw Avenue west of this interchange is Business Loop Interstate 94" One of these "west"s needs to be removed, I think.
- In the History section, you say "US and US 112" I think there might be a number missing here.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
A couple of comments regarding prose, so I am putting this article on hold. Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 20:23, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Copyediting is done. Let me know if you have any other feedback. Imzadi1979 (talk) 21:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Everything else looks good, so I'm passing the article. Nice work, and thanks for the prompt response! Dana boomer (talk) 21:32, 3 November 2008 (UTC)