Talk:M-13 Connector (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 00:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
Quality of article is good.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Article complies with MoS.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
Good.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
References included where necessary.

C. No original research:
No original research found.
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
All major aspects about the topic have been covered.

B. Focused:
Article remains focused throughout.
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
No bias found.
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Article is stable.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images used in the article are all tagged correctly.

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Images are provided, appropriate, and have suitable captions.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 00:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

I found a reference stating a 1961 opening which I have included in the article. Everything else is good.--Dom497 (talk) 00:33, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There's a very specific reason I included that webpage only as an external link: it's a self-published source, and including it causes the article to fail the GA criteria. I have removed it. Imzadi 1979 → 01:00, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]