Talk:M-13 (Michigan highway)

M-13 (Michigan highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 14, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / Michigan Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Michigan
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Genesee/Shiawassee county line

The table is now misleading as M-13 is right on the Genesee/Shiawassee county line. How can this be fixed? Steelbeard1 (talk) 21:29, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, according to the Control Reference maps from MDOT here, The road runs in Genesee County, as it is not on the corresponding Shiawasee Map. However, that could have been to prevent duplication, in which case the centerline of the road is right on the county line. This would imply that the intersections indicated for I-69, M-21, and M-57 are actually in Genesee County as they are east of the road centerline, and hence, east of the county line. If anything, I suppose the table should be changed to Genesee County. Strato|sphere 04:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

The article does technically have all the "big four", so it's at C-class. C L — 01:22, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]