Talk:Mên-an-Tol

Cornwall Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

Dropdown box error

In the dropdown box, here, the Cornwall Wikiproject one, there is a link that is supposed to go to suggestions for standard headings. Unfortunately, the link is red and goes to nothing at all. I expect to edit this Men an Tol article at some point, and I would like to follow the Cornwall standard structure. So, if someone could fix the link, or at least put a working version of it on the talk page here, it would be appreciated. (Hopefully, someone will see this talk page.) Anyway, thank you. Zeno Izen 01:47, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alignments

I have added the sentences about the alignment between this site, Boscawen-un, and the church at St. Buryan. This is easily verifiable with Google Earth.--Carfax6 22:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

This is original research and to be usable you need to find an original printed source etc. to which you can make a reference or citation.Rosser 16:52, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It appears,from maps,that this is aligned with midwinter sunrise & midsummer sunset,I can find nothing to say what it is. AptitudeDesign (talk) 06:40, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

After sitting on the page for 6 years, I've removed the speculation about the supposed alignment "between this site, Boscawen-un, and the church at St. Buryan." As mentioned on Talk:Boscawen-Un it's easy to get a ruler and make all sorts of random alignments, especially when an area (like this one) is full of prehistoric sites. As for this suggestion that the Mên-an-Tol is "aligned with midwinter sunrise & midsummer sunset" note that there is evidence that the site has been heavily altered, so such an alignment (if it exists) is also probably just random chance. Pasicles (talk) 19:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology?

Can anyone add a note about what Mên-an-Tol means? I assume the Tol is of the same root as dol- in dolmen, but perhaps I'm off the mark? Cheers -- Erik Anderson 67.182.137.135 (talk) 05:09, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mên(Stone)-an(the)-Tol(Hole) 81.158.79.45 (talk) 03:05, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinate error

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for

Co-ordinates.....why are 90% of the locations wrong on wiki ?

—94.174.228.205 (talk) 19:45, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Better now? The coordinates weren't that far off, and fewer coordinates on Wikipedia would be wrong if there were more folk like you pointing out the errors. Deor (talk) 21:47, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

terrible

This article is awful. It contains no references and the grammar is terrible. It's hard to even read the sentences. Who wrote this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.119.151.233 (talk) 08:33, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A page like that is what usually happens when an article is built up from little bits of random pieces people add over the years. Anyway, I've has a stab at improving the article, so it might be more coherent now. Pasicles (talk) 19:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Men an tol and menhir

Generally, as ItsACityOfApes understands standing stones, the Menhir is a stone that is vertical and erect - thus has male attributions. The Men-an-tol is a stone with a hole in the middle - thus female attributions. There are indeed Men-an-tol stones in New Hampshire and there is a tradition of the parents passing newborn babies through such stones. ItsACityOfApes (talk) 18:37, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]