Talk:Mästerby
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article contains a translation of Mästerby from sv.wikipedia. (610906921 et seq.) |
| This article contains a translation of Slaget vid Mästerby from sv.wikipedia. (611584821 et seq.) |
Parish or settlement?
[edit]Is this article supposed to be about d:Q10593273 (the parish) or d:Q10593270 (the settlement)? Ainali (talk) 07:51, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
- The article is right where it should be at d:Q10593273 (socken/district not a parish). If you read it you will see that the is about the socken/now district Mästerby and that the settlement d:Q10593270 with the same name is mentioned in this article rather than having a separate article as it has on sv-wiki. It is easier to have all the "layers" of these small settlements with the same name under one article here. I haven't got around to sort out all the parishes yet, but will do. The parishes and the socken/districts are two different ways to divide the areas, sometimes they coincide, sometimes not, so the d:Q10593271 (the parish) may not be correct here. I'll come back to that when I sort out those and explain how that is connected to this place. w.carter-Talk 08:10, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Done Parish also explained under in the Geography section. Take a look. Also note that the description "socken" is very often translated (wrongly) to parish since this is a Scandinavian way of dividing the land unknown to most of the rest of the world and 'parish' is often the nearest thing to explain it. w.carter-Talk 08:26, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mästerby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140606203857/http://www.battleofwisby.com/?page_id=693 to http://www.battleofwisby.com/?page_id=693
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
Numbers
[edit]Hello folks, the numbers of participants could be wrong
If the countryside men could fight another battle later on with again 2000 faling, wouldn it be illogical that 1500 from 1500 hundred have fallen? I checked the numbers are in the original article too but still it doesnt make sense.
So either some godland troops were inactiv at that time and flee as the other have fallen but I tought inactiv troops were still counted on the participant number. 2001:16B8:B8BE:7A00:B1E0:B443:B8BF:7303 (talk) 23:18, 29 September 2024 (UTC)