Talk:Lysgårdsbakken/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 18:03, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this "non-railway" article. Pyrotec (talk) 18:03, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

A well-referenced, well-illustrated article (and an impressive facility)

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
Well referenced.

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Well illustrated.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding this article GA-status. Congratulations on gaining another GA.

Incidently, I've been to Lysgårdsbakken, as a tourist, shortly after the 1994 Winter Olympics, most likely spring of 1995. It's certainly impressive. Pyrotec (talk) 15:54, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time for the review. Personally I've never been to the hills, although I've been in Lillehammer a few times (mostly to get on or off a train). Arsenikk ^(talk) 16:34, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]