Talk:Lyrtech

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 February 2014. The result of the discussion was speedy keep (nomination withdrawn).

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Start‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Start This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Fair use rationale for Image:Lyrtech logo.png

Image:Lyrtech logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Development of the Ad Lib sound card

Would love to see the history of the involvement of LyrTech in the development of the Ad Lib sound card. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanph01 (talk • contribs) 20:59, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find any sources about that. Someone not using his real name (talk) 04:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

More sources

Most sources about the company are in French; La Presse has most of them here. This wiki page provides a very incomplete picture (too rosy); the company was in trouble even it wasn't on the verge of bankruptcy. The growth in revenues wasn't matched by a growth in profits etc. They were actually operating at a pretty big loss even they got that Deloitte ward [1] Also the direction of the company changed at least a couple of times. [2][3] Someone not using his real name (talk) 04:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]