Talk:Lynn Zechiedrich

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Subject not notable enough for page.

This page appears to be some professors CV, and is not worthy of a Wikipedia page. 2600:1700:F2F0:43B0:BDA2:2528:7A6C:EA8A (talk) 05:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article appears to be self-aggrandizing

Articles tone and structure appears to include a lot of subjective and exaggerated material, often grandiose. Often, shared accomplishments like patents are written to sound as if she was the sole inventor, and the “Flutist” section is bizzare.

The subject is also simply one of many tens of thousands of professors, and many of the awards and honors are minor or typical. The entire thing reads like a resume rather than an article about a notable individual. 2600:1700:F2F0:43B0:BDA2:2528:7A6C:EA8A (talk) 05:42, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article should be considered for deletion

Agreeing with the other reviewers here, this page reads largley as a CV. The fact the whole page was not deleted during the removal of the "flutist" section is strange. While Zechiedrich appears to be an accomplished investigator the article appears to be self written or self-promotional at best. RickAndMortise (talk) 17:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]