Jump to content

Talk:Lynn Canal Highway

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Neutrality

[edit]

The existing article was edited at some point to entirely leave out all criticism of the road, and only discusses benefits of the road. A "good" article should include both perspectives, and cite all criticism and benefits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.229.79.11 (talk) 20:53, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but you need to provide reliable sources for that information. The link to the embedded homemade YouTube video neither contained the information you added, nor would it be considered a reliable source even if it did contain the information you added. Brycehughes (talk) 06:26, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is misleading. The road will not actually be connected to the main continental road system. But to a ferry terminal 18 miles south of Skagway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.145.240.113 (talk) 20:35, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is extremely over-biased towards the "no road" viewpoints. All of the links go to anti-road websites, and the entire article (except for a VERY brief mention) is negative aspect of the road. The positive aspects need to be fully listed to bring this article to a neutral state. Until that point in time, this article should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.165.190.11 (talk) 22:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't a single positive viewpoint in the entire article. I think the road counter points need to be mentioned, such as the aging of the ferry system (as well as it's service decline and budget) and the debate over capitol access.

there is no talk of the radical environmentalist legal attacks against any development in Southeast Alaska's Tongass National Forest. The money that funds groups such as earth justice and seacc comes from granting agencies who have a clearly defined anti-development agenda. They come at the issue with a "we just want to work with everyone" approach, but they are not genuine. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.145.225.37 (talk) 21:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The external links are all extremely anti-road with no counter opinions, statements or facts.

Bob Unferth —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobunf (talkcontribs) 21:22, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It wouldn't be so bad if it were limited to this article. However, the same biased perspective was added to numerous related articles.RadioKAOS (talk) 04:02, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lynn Canal Highway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:29, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]