Talk:Lyle Sturgeon/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 22:52, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: ForksForks (talk · contribs) 12:48, 16 August 2024 (UTC)

1. Well-written

I have read the entire article and can confirm the prose is good.

MOS compliance: The lead is appropriate for hte legnth of the article, the layout is good, others are n/a.

2. Verifiable

I have checked all the article's claims against sources and they are verified. All citations are to reliable sources.

Copyvio is 5.7%

3. Broad in its coverage

I have spent a while searching for more information on this person and have not found any. I also asked a couple others to perform the same check and they came to a similar conclusion. I believe this article is complete at the extent to which we can at this time write it.

4. Neutral

Hard to argue otherwise.

5. Stable

Of course.

6. Illustrated

Any images in this article would probably be undue. No PD images exist.

In accordance with the criteria, I will pass this article immediately.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.