Jump to content

Talk:Lydia Hart

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleLydia Hart has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 31, 2011Good article nomineeListed

Lydia leaving

[edit]

Iv just found out that Lydia is leaveing in January 2010 dose this mean that she will be found out?--Sheep 2009 (talk) 20:40, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, this is not a forum. Plus, unless you have a source for that, make sure you don't add it. W93 (talk) 21:09, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Lydia is leaving read this. http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/soaps/s13/hollyoaks/spoilers/a190264/2724-lydia-stabs-zoe-at-sarahs-grave.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheep 2009 (talkcontribs) 18:35, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Does not state she is leaving. Please only make edits like you did with actual references.W93 (talk) 18:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
its proves a lot i don't think the police will let her go after she killed someone.--Sheep 2009 (talk) 19:00, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You are completely speculating, yes it says she is arrested. However, she might not actually go to jail. Until you find a source that says otherwise, this can not be considered reliable.W93 (talk) 22:47, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
as Lydia left hollyoaks now or is she returning.--92.4.50.27 (talk) 20:41, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
She's left, the character was given a life sentence and no trial as she pled guilty.RAIN the ONE (Talk) 23:56, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lydia Hart/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: HorrorFan121 (talk) 02:30, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reviewing this article. ;) I have found a few minor problems with the article.

  • Channel 5 links to a disambiguation page. [1] This needs to be corrected. checkY
  • The article has two rotted links. These [2] (#4) [3] (#24) need to be fixed. checkY

Lead

  • The lead should summarize the article as a whole. The reception of the character should be mentioned somewhere in there. checkY

Prose

  • I found no problems with the prose after reading the article. No grammar/spelling mistakes. checkY

Citations

  • The last sentence of the reception section should have a citation. checkY
  • No problem with reliability on the sources. checkY


Overall, a very interesting article. Once you fixed these issues I brought up it should be good. HorrorFan121 (talk) 02:30, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed all the points mentioned. I expanded the lead to reflect the reception, there are now no disambiguation or dead links.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 18:49, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Great! The article can be listed now. Congrats on the hard work. ;) HorrorFan121 (talk) 20:18, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]