Talk:Lycan

This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-07-31. The result of the discussion was no consensus for deletion.

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Film

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Spelling of 'Lycan'

I thought the plural of 'Lycan' was 'Lycan', especially as Lycan comes from Greek 'Lykanos' (this means 'wolf' which is where 'Lycaon' came from) and Greek plurals in English are often the same as the word.

Usage

Is the term lycan used anywhere apart from the Underworld series ? -- Beardo 14:34, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 October, the following was removed - perhaps accidentally:

I doubt it. Personally I think this ought to be merged as a section into lycantrophy. --Joffeloff 20:57, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

restored 10 December

I don't think so. but it doesn't matter personally I think this ought to be its own catagory, death dealer isn't used outside the movie but it has its own catagoryAlso characters and races in other movies usually have their own section, so why not leave it the way it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.10.105.141 (talk • contribs) on 3 October

I don't see that the article needs to go - but it needs to be written more in an out-of-universe style - and make clear what universe is being dealt with. -- Beardo 13:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Ive given cleaning up the article my best shot, and I think it looks alot better now. I'd be appreciative if someone could look it over and say what they think. Regards.SMegatron 13:32, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{i have heard the term "lycan" used in soomething other then the underworld seris it was a huge book i found at the library in the anciant history section it was called "the lycan" it was a fasinatiing book although some of was in latin wich i can read a little but not a lot!.. agl243}

I've seen the word used to describe similar beings in video games (the knightsonline mmorpg comes to mind), I don't feel this should be deleted since there are plenty of other wikipedia entries relating only to fictional topics. it's also been commented that it should be be erased for lack of citation, but since the artical was written only as it relates to the underworld movie franchise I'd say that qualifies as hte only necisary source for most of the document, aside from word origin

Origin of word

Surely the word comes from the ancient Greek lykánthropos (λυκάνθρωπος): λύκος, lýkos ("wolf") + άνθρωπος, ánthrōpos ("man") not from Lycaon ? -- Beardo 14:45, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to Sci Fi/Fantasy writer Laurell K. Hamilton the term lycan is supposed to be a plant. The term lycanthropy is supposed to refer the were-wolves tales. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danar (talk • contribs) on 28 August 2006

lichen is the plant and it isn't really a plant it is a symbiotic alge and fungus shouldnt wikipedia have a section on it or something? Plant-like colonies of fungi and algae that grow on the exposed surface of rocks. Lichen grow at a constant rate within a single geographic area. college.hmco.com/geology/resources/geologylink/glossary/l.html

it is already here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lichen —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.10.105.141 (talk • contribs) on 3 October 2006

That sounds like a bad joke made by a panellists at an SF con. -- Beardo 13:55, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Williamlycanelder.JPG

Image:Williamlycanelder.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:21, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prod

Don't see how the criteria exclude this, it's about a common theme through a two films,so doesn't fit neatly as a section in eihter of them written in out of universe perspective, what's the problem? --Nate1481(^t/_c) 11:14, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]