Talk:Gliese 65

Radial velocity

The average radial velocity is equal to +21.9±0.1 km/s according to the recent bibliographic catalogue of radial velocities by Malaroda et al. [1] --Yigor (talk) 22:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

En dash

If you look closely at the paper announcing the discovery of L 726–8, you can see that the horizontal line in the designation is an en-dash, not a hyphen or a minus. How much does anyone care? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.240.145.232 (talk) 15:04, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Luyten 726-8. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20120709190105/http://astrobib.u-strasbg.fr:2008/cgi-bin/cdsbib?2001MNRAS.328...45M to http://astrobib.u-strasbg.fr:2008/cgi-bin/cdsbib?2001MNRAS.328...45M

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:42, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Distance of both stars

I know this may go a bit over the scope of Wikipedia but I was wondering when I saw the EDR3 parallaxes for this star system. It is not compatible with 26.5 year orbit and at max 8.8 AU separation of the 2 stars. Anyone knows which measurement is more likely to be wrong? 26.5 year orbit or EDR3 parallaxes?--McBayne (talk) 16:33, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gliese 65

I propose that we rename this article to Gliese 65. This is the name that is most frequently used by research papers to refer to the entire system, examples include Kervella et al. 2016, Kochukhov and Lavail 2017, Barnes et al. 2017, MacDonald et al. 2018, and Fleming et al. 2022. AstroChara (talk) 00:19, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's a template you can use for this; see WP:RSPM. SevenSpheres (talk) 00:49, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Click in here to see the result. 117daveawesome (talk) 12:56, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 30 September 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 12:49, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Luyten 726-8 → Gliese 65 – Gliese 65 is the name that is most frequently used (WP:COMMONNAME) by research papers to refer to the entire system, examples include Kervella et al. 2016, Kochukhov and Lavail 2017, Barnes et al. 2017, MacDonald et al. 2018, and Fleming et al. 2022. AstroChara (talk) 01:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Rreagan007 (talk) 20:47, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Grudging support: I agree that the literature overwhelmingly use the Gliese designation. However, almost always in the form GJ 65, occasionally without a space. Just to throw a spanner in the works, Simbad prefers G 272-61, but I think we can quietly skip over that as an option. Previous discussion agreed to use Gliese in article titles rather than GJ, so Gliese 65 is what we end up with, despite common usage. C'est la vie. Lithopsian (talk) 14:45, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Please remember to tag redirects that you create per WP:REDCAT.

voorts (talk/contributions) 23:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]