Talk:Luton Town MIGs

Bedfordshire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bedfordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bedfordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BedfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject BedfordshireTemplate:WikiProject BedfordshireBedfordshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Organized crime Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Football: England Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

The You tube video

I'm not sure whether this should remain on the article or not. I have left it for now, but it is from The Real Football Factories series on Bravo and so surely is copyrighted? Maybe someone else will know for sure. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 18:05, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Luton Town MIGs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110225155451/http://www.southwarknews.co.uk:80/00,news,9575,5256,00.htm to http://www.southwarknews.co.uk/00,news,9575,5256,00.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deviation from article title

This article contains a lot of details of violent incidents at LTFC matches but does not show anything attributing them to the Luton Town MIGs. Material not directly related to the subject in question should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.32.223.126 (talk) 10:40, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to go with you on that (mostly) - the Bedford today article explicitly mentions MIG involvement, but many of the other sources don't. I'd hazard that many news sources purposefully (and rightly) avoid distinguishing one group of morons from another when their loutish behavior is distinguishable only by a self conferred moniker and/or some badly drawn tattoos. Its simpler to lump every such gang in Britain together under the umbrella terms; thugs and hooligans. Therefore many of the sources about violence at Luton matches probably are about crimes perpetrated by MIGs, but haven't been described as such to avoid giving them any credibility or notoriety. That being said, this is an encyclopedia, and its best for us to stick to the facts, where we can find them. The Bedford source which names them - and the associated article text can stay, whilst other passages about non-specific violence can probably safely be removed with consensus. Edaham (talk) 03:35, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's a bit of a superfluous list anyway if each entry serves only to underscore the fact that they are violent on a regular basis. Edaham (talk) 03:40, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Concur, at least there should be suitable section headings. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 02:43, 29 July 2018 (UTC).[reply]

I've taken a few bits off today that were very thin - If we take off everything that doesn't mention MIGs we get a very small (but better) article. I'm happy to do that and I think that that's the consensus, but I'll give it a while first. Joe (talk) 09:54, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]