Talk:Luton Carnival

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Festivals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Festivals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FestivalsWikipedia:WikiProject FestivalsTemplate:WikiProject FestivalsFestivals articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Bedfordshire High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bedfordshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bedfordshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BedfordshireWikipedia:WikiProject BedfordshireTemplate:WikiProject BedfordshireBedfordshire articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	The infobox box status of this article has been marked as: Incomplete

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

References

This article is wholly lacking in any independent references, and hence doesn't comply with WP:REF. I have added a refs tag and suitable cites where required, but its quite an unsustainable quality article at present. Rgds, -- 217.42.180.127 (talk) 16:39, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst some improvement is needed, the external links section effectivly covers the references, it just needs organising. How is the BBC not an independent reference? Over tthe top use of the citation ref isnt very helpful. Maybe some time in putting the refs in would be a better use of time? I'll have a look at some point.--GazMan7 (talk) 11:22, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attendance

I removed "attended by over 150,000 – 200,000 people each year,^{[Citation needed]}" because the BBC report for 2016 says "organisers estimated there were 9-10,000 people attending, which is down on some previous years when up to 50,000 have attended". JonH (talk) 20:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Luton Carnival. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160702151529/http://www.luton.gov.uk/news/Pages/40th-anniversary-of-Luton-International-Carnival-on-29-May-2016.aspx to http://www.luton.gov.uk/news/Pages/40th-anniversary-of-Luton-International-Carnival-on-29-May-2016.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]