Talk:Lust for Life (Iggy Pop song)

Interpol's "Say Hello to the Angels" uses a similar riff in parts, and I believe there have been other songs, though none of these are as close as "Are you gonna be my girl?"--DCo1 02:52, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

only the drum beat on PDA is at all similar the guitar riff it completely different. --80.41.28.81 21:40, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It just occurred to me that the drum intro on "Car Jamming" by The Clash is also very similar to the opening of "Lust For Life." 24.6.66.193 10:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:IggyPopLustForLife.jpg

The image Image:IggyPopLustForLife.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --23:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Van Gogh Reference?

Irving Stone wrote an historical novel, Lust for Life, about the life of Van Gogh. Is the line "Of course I've had it in the ear before" an allusion to Van Gogh's slicing off his own ear? 45750born (talk) 18:17, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandellas

As well as the similarity between the drum beat for "Lust for Life" and Martha & The Vandellas "I'm Ready for Love", they also share a similarity in the delivery of the lyric: Compare Iggy singing "about something called love, yeah something called love" with Martha singing " I'm ready for love, I'm truly ready for love". --Design (talk) 06:29, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 April 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:22, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lust for Life (Iggy Pop song) → Lust for Life (song) – The Iggy Pop song has existed for 40+ years, has been used in numerous films, tv shows, and tv commercials, and is regarded as iconic. A new song by Lana Del Rey does not compare in terms of historical or cultural importance. This page move is not uncontroversial or merely technical. This should have been discussed first. I would argue that the Iggy Pop title is the main subject and should have preference. Either way, the matter should be discussed. - The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 14:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:04, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TheOldJacobite: Queried move request. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:04, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose moving article to Lust for Life (song). It does not appear to me that the Iggy Pop song should be the primary topic for Lust for Life. Therefore, since disambiguation is required, the use of incomplete disambiguation is contrary to its purpose. Back links from Lust for Life (song) should be retargeted to Lust for Life (Iggy Pop song), then redirect Lust for Life (song) to Lust for Life.--John Cline (talk) 21:50, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- You're confusing the matter. No one is suggesting the song should replace Lust for Life, which would remain a dab page. But, the Iggy Pop song is certainly the primary topic when it comes to songs of this title. The disambiguation on the Lana Del Rey title is enough to prevent confusion. ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 22:56, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  Actually, I did understand, and agree with all that you said, except your conclusion that Iggy Pop's song should be titled [Lust for Life (song)]. It simply goes awry of best practice to resolve ambiguity with incomplete disambiguation. The song is not so unique that it needs special handling and unique solutions. Instead, the opposite is true: Ambiguity routinely occurs and disambiguation is well prescribed, and solutions are easily discerned. Therefore, just as the album is titled, Lust for Life (Iggy Pop album), so should the song be "Lust for Life" (Iggy Pop song).--John Cline (talk) 16:52, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:PDAB. f e minist 09:56, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – While I realize that the Lana Del Rey song was only released on Wednesday, the two songs were released at completely different times. I don't think there should be a primary topic for "Lust for Life". 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:60F2:4B79:1552:E7C8 (talk) 12:03, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
" the Lana Del Rey song was only released on Wednesday" :: a fortnight or so will show how popular this new song is. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lust for Life (Iggy Pop song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071020013604/http://www.ugo.com/filmtv/top11-classicrock/?cur=trainspotting to http://www.ugo.com/filmtv/top11-classicrock/?cur=trainspotting

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:33, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]