Jump to content

Talk:Lupicinus (comes per Thracias)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Lupicinus and St. Lupicinus are two different people. < unsigned comment 16:58, 31 January 2007 Shikyo3 (noted byJeepday 03:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

No problem we can build a disambiguate page and link from them to two separate articles. But there is really no rush to break them into separate articles because the are both very short. Both of these people have very similar names, are historical people and lived in similar times and similar areas. Wikipedia:Verifiability is one of Wikipedia's three core content policies, so one of the first things you need to do is find a reference (or three) for Lupicinus and clearly use references to show he is different from St. Lupicinus, I really know nothing about either subject so when I went looking for references I found what is on there now (and some more similar).
Then I look and see you have all ready made the article for St. Lupicinus, good job. You can use the example on this page Tourist trap to see how to address Disambiguation without a separate page on simple ones like this. You will still want to find some reference for Lupicinus, just because of the whole Wikipedia:Verifiability thing and that the references for the Saint show up first on a search. If I can be of any help just let me know, have fun. Jeepday 03:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lupicinus (comes rei militaris). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:29, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]