Talk:Lunada
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]The Aventurero track is featuring Nubawn, not Sean Paul. The tracklisting that I provided there (composer, etc) is taken directly from Thalía's official site. Hedwig0407 (talk) 14:33, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
No official source for leaving EMI and joining Casablanca Records!
[edit]I would just like to let you know that neither Thalía nor any of her official sources has never announced that her contract finished with EMI, not even that she would join Casablanca Records. All this is an invent of the yellow press. I also asked Thalía's manager at EMI Televisa Music for confirmation and not even her knows about this. So, I've removed (put into comments) these false statements. --El Mexicano (talk) 13:20, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
LUNADA SOLD 20.000 COPIES WORLDWIDE ONLY?
[edit]Stop spamming on Wikipedia/...If you don't like Thalia,it's ok.But don't lie.Lunada sold 400.000.In Greece only she sold 20.000 due to IFPI.So,how can she have sold only this?THere are no fans in the rest opf the world???This is just stupid...Also everybody knows that Thalia has sold more than 25 million copies,as she 9Thalia) had said it on a Greek TV show when she had come in Greece...12 million is just another lie of Paulina Rubio's fans.Don't say what you like,but what is true here.I think that Wikipedia shoudn;t be ffree for everyone to write artcles.They shoulb be controled somehow.
LUNADA HAVING SOLD 150.000 COPIES?
[edit]I constantly change this information as it is not official.The sales of Lunada have never been confirmed neither by Thalia nor by her previous record company EMI.This statement has been invented by some Thalia's antifans who spam on all Thalia wikipedia pages...!Maybe you should lock the article of Lunada without telling about the sales as this information is fake and not official.I remember that they had also written that Lunada sucks!!!Is this the approproate vocabulary for Wikipedia pages?I believe that the article shoud be locked so that there is no spamming anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.74.127.166 (talk) 07:55, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Lunada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151201181906/http://www.emimusic.com.mx/portal/hgxpp001.aspx?2 to http://www.emimusic.com.mx/portal/hgxpp001.aspx?2
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111008204133/http://www.emimusic.pl/katalog1Polish to http://www.emimusic.pl/katalog1Polish
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:14, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
REFS
[edit]- 300,000 units as of 2012 | Univision