Talk:Luke Timothy Johnson
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
position on same-sex unions
[edit]The article currently soft pedals Johnson's rather full-throated endorsement of same sex unions. I'm updating the section to add quotes that better capture the cited article. Nettyl (talk) 07:38, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Untitled
[edit]I've got a couple of concerns about this page - I don't know that what's here now demonstrates that this person is notable according to WP:PROF - he may be, but I don't know enough about him to say - if he is, the article should demonstrate that.
My other concern is that this has the appearance/tone of a resume or CV - what's here is just a listing of his education and publications, not a prose piece on the person.
Can you find some sources beyond his faculty page to demonstrate notability and to flesh out the article? Lcarscad 14:16, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
In the fields of Early Christianity and of New Testament research, LTJ is a very notable figure. He was widely regarded for his responses to the Jesus Seminar. I agree that this article does have the tone of a CV, but let's see if I can respond to the points on WP:PROF
- 1- In 1996 LTJ was approached to have a "public debate" with Crossan and Borg. [Here is the Text].
- 2-I think the above debate also covers point 2 in WP:PROF.
- 3-I myself took a course as an undergraduate called "Historical Jesus", we read Johnsons "The Real Jesus" alongside many other scholars.
- 4-He does have a large body of work, as indicated on his [faculty page], however his "Writings of the New Testament: An Interpretation" is a large comprehensive work and is often used as a course textbook.
I also think it's important to note that while Crossan (who I actually appreciate academically, as does Johnson, despite how I may come across) is the more widely know commentator for documentaries on early Christianity and Biblical issues, I understand Crossan himself only taught at the undergraduate level. Johnson teaches both Masters and PhD courses.
Thats my two cents ( a little background on my, I earned a BA in Religion and Philosophy from [Berry College] and a MTS from [Candler at Emory] Jpm78 22:34, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Johnson is definitely a major figure in New Testament studies. I've added some information just now and will add more shortly, after additional research. --Halcatalyst 13:51, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
This sentence is ambiguous: He objects to the Seminar's unconventional historical methodology and attempts to carve out a critically conservative position on this hotly debated topic. There's no way to tell if "attempts" is a verb (He attempts to carve) or a noun (He objects to the Seminar's attempts) without additional information about the Jesus Seminar. --I made the edit.Jakob3 (talk) 09:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Catholicism articles
- Low-importance Catholicism articles
- WikiProject Catholicism articles
- Start-Class Wisconsin articles
- Low-importance Wisconsin articles