Talk:Luke Nightingale

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Football: England / English non-league Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the English non-league task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Made vast improvements Dean randall 19:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Needs reliable sources

Number 57, www.neilbrown.newcastlefans.com, a subdomain of newcastlefans.com, appears to be a self-published source that may lack the required reliability for a valid BLPPROD objection. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:23, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's widely regarded as a reliable source and is used on thousands of Wikipedia articles (you can check this by the number of transclusions of {{NeilBrownPlayers}}, which is often used to link to the site). You can also see that it is regularly used in discussions at WT:FOOTY. Feel free to bring the matter up there if you need further reassurance. Number 5 7 16:26, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Number 57, thanks, I wasn't aware of this. Even the template description itself, though, seems to recommend it for the "external links section" of articles. A quick look at a few of the transclusions seems to confirm this view. Just like IMDb, it may lack the required reliability to be used as a source while still being a valid external link for thousands of Wikipedia articles. My concern remains, for this specific article and the specific citation done here. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:33, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source is fine but I don't have time to waste arguing about this so I've just replaced it with another one. Next time, rather than wasting other editors' time like this, please just find a source yourself – it took all of five seconds to find something on Nightingale on Google. Number 5 7 16:38, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]