Talk:Luke Jermay
This article was nominated for deletion on 2 November 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
cleanup list
[edit]Is there any way that list of Jermay's publications can be cleaned up? Is it even necessary? It's very long compared to the rest of the info. Nsmith 84 (talk) 12:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
tone
[edit]This doesn't feel particularly encyclopedic, and some of the sections (one I took out) feel almost like an advertisement. --Joe Decker (talk) 01:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thief?
[edit]I understand Mr. Jermay is involved in some scandals with paid products of his, but that really isn't necessary to add it to wikipedia. I will remove it.
Can we get whoever is adding that to please stop vandalizing the page? I understand he is involved in some scandal, and adding random words to a wikipedia page is not the way to go about solving ig. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.29.0 (talk) 18:06, 14 September 2010 (UTC) Twotonedskazn (talk) 13:04, 9 September 2010 (UTC)