Talk:Luke Bell (musician)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Country music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Kentucky / Wyoming Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Kentucky portal This article is supported by WikiProject Kentucky (assessed as Low-importance).
	Wyoming portal This article is supported by WikiProject Wyoming (assessed as Low-importance).

An item related to this article has been nominated to appear on the Main Page in the "In the news" section. You can visit the nomination to take part in the discussion. Editors are encouraged to update the article with information obtained from reliable news sources to include recent events.
Notice date: 1 September 2022. Please remove this template when the nomination process has concluded, replacing it with Template:ITN talk if appropriate.

Music Video Attributions

The music videos mentioned for this page have been archived at https://archive.org/details/youtube-3p2oXxQgvwQ and https://archive.org/details/youtube-pRcwP8XhMWs. What is best practices for attributing them in references and under the Music videos table? Themontecassino (talk) 00:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Death

@Rockchalk717: As a reminder, the onus is on those seeking to include content to achieve consensus for it, and that has not happened here. The mere existence of sources stating something does not mandate inclusion. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:35, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Nikkimaria: I had this same issue with you at Adam Schlesinger and the end result was leaving it in the article. This is the EXACT SAME situation. However, unlike Schlesinger, Luke Bell was barely notable enough for an article before his death. A google news search of his name and quite of bit of scrolling later shows exactly 4 articles (talking about this Luke Bell anyway) from before his death while the rest are from after his death. You fought me with Schlesinger when I used this same evidence. It's not the "mere existence" of sources that issue. It's the lack of evidence of sources indicating any sort of substantial notability from before his death (as is evident with the lack of reliable sources about him from before his death) and the overwhelming amount of reliable sources from after his death. And again, as I said on Schlesinger's talkpage, a single objection and no evidence of more notability from before the death is not a consensus for exclusion. Not to mention (again) you have already changed what your issue is 3 times with this and I am already getting flashbacks to our discussion on this same issue and I would prefer not to go round and round with you again and you constantly changing what your issue is. I've given you your evidence now leave it in the article and don't all of the sudden change what your objection is now that I've (yet again) disproven your objection.--Rockchalk7 17 00:50, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, consensus is required for inclusion rather than exclusion. And there is substantial evidence of notability from before his death - some quick samples: [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] and plenty more. So essentially what you've "proven" is that your argument is based on faulty searching. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:44, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As it's been a few days and no evidence supporting inclusion seems to be forthcoming, I've re-removed the disputed content. Please don't restore it unless/until consensus is achieved for its inclusion - perhaps try an RfC to get additional perspectives. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:30, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]