Talk:Luke Appling

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago Low‑importance

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Baseball: College / Hall of Fame High‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject College baseball.
	This article is supported by the Hall of Fame task force.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group.

Longest At Bat

The article says that he has one of the longest at bats, fouling off 10 balls and having a 24 pitch at bat. This is not cited and it does not add up. Now, I have heard of him hitting 24 fouls on 9-19-40, but I don't know the validity of it and it isn't cited here. The longest one I know of is Roy Thomas, who had 22 fouls, a full count, and a triple, putting him at around 26 pitches (I don't know if he had any strikes)...So thats why I took some of that out about him having the longest at bat. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.151.69.47 (talk) 00:34, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

24th edition of Uncle John's Bathroom Reader, page 394, says it was 28 pitches - September 19, 1940 against Red Ruffing of the Yankees. :) 2001:56A:FA85:3800:5CAA:1E9C:D66:AA82 (talk) 22:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Luke Appling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061112233352/http://www.thedeadballera.com/Obits/Appling.Luke.Obit.html to http://www.thedeadballera.com/Obits/Appling.Luke.Obit.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:58, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]