Talk:Luis Ibáñez/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 01:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status. I expect to post a full review within two days and will notify the nominator then. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguations: none found
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:51, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- The article is very poorly written, needs a thorough copy-edit throughout. You may be able to enlist help from the WP:Guild of copyeditors. Currently this is a long way away from meeting critirion #1 of the WP:GACR.
- The lead does not fully summarise the article, see WP:LEAD
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Sources appear reliable and back up statements, although I have to assume good faith as I only relying on machine translations.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Broad and focussed
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit warring
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Licensed and captioned
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- ON hold for seven days for copy-editing. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- Well there have been a few minor edits but nothing resembling a full copy-edit and no response from the nominator, so I will not be listing this at this time. When it has been copy-edited, take it to WP:Peer review and when any points from that have been addressed, re-nominate at WP:GAN. Please check the WP:GACR and make sure that any future nominations meet all of the criteria. Jezhotwells (talk) 11:50, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: