Talk:Lugnaquilla

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lugnaquilla article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

British and Irish hills

This article is within the scope of WikiProject British and Irish hills, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the hills and mountains of Great Britain and Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British and Irish hillsWikipedia:WikiProject British and Irish hillsTemplate:WikiProject British and Irish hillsBritish and Irish hills articles

Ireland High‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

August 2007. Height

Unless there is some evidence that Ireland has been resurveyed Lug has been 3039 ft/926 m for the last 30 years that I have been going there and using OSI maps of the area. There is however a page on the OSI website where the heights are different from those generally accepted but no evidence of any survey. I am going to Ireland very shortly and will look at the latest survey maps. I first came across this height issue when Timeineurope started changing several Irish mountain heights and I mentioned it on his talk page but he could not provide any evidence of any new survey confirming the height other then this page at the OSI which I suspect has errors in it. ww2censor 18:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[1] is the newest OSi publication on the height of Lugnaquillia Mountain and as such should be trusted over older OSi publications. You suspect the page is wrong but have provided no evidence except obsolete OSi maps, which, needless to say, can't be trusted over the newest publication available from the same source. Timeineurope 18:14, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You suspect the page is correct but have not confirmed it to be so with data from currently published maps. Why should this webpage be trusted? No reason at all, especially when many other mountain related website say otherwise. I will be in Ireland within the next 2 weeks and will check published maps to see if they coincide with the OSI web page you trust over older publications. Do you have access to any currently published maps? We shall see but I doubt that Lugnaquilla has lost 7 feet. ww2censor 19:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually now I look, I'm a little confused where the 926m figure is coming from - mountain related websites such as here and here all list it as 925m, and just to sound the death knell (!), the OSI 4th edition map I have to hand here also lists it as such. But I've no idea about the new 924m height... Schcambo 20:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I admit that most of my maps are older and list it as 3039' which converts to more than 926, but definitely moer than 924! As stated, I will check some new maps when I get to Ireland. ww2censor 21:24, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was no consensus for move. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:38, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lugnaquilla → Lugnaquillia — I request a rename of the mountain to match the OSI maps. Gingerbus (talk) 13:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: See your talk page for more on this. We use WP:COMMONNAME here and OSI is not always correct either. Where are the third-party WP:RS to support this. While a Google search is not the most reliable guide you will see that Lugnaquillia gets only 4,000+ hits while Lugnaquilla gets 71,000+ hits. ww2censor (talk) 13:47, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lugnaquilla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928045248/http://www.osi.ie/mapping/FAQ/mountains.shtml to http://www.osi.ie/mapping/FAQ/mountains.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wording in paragraph 2

I find the use of the word 'often' in this sentence unusual (given that the mountains shape is more or less permanent):

Lug's massif includes several major summits and corrie lakes, often lying in a "horseshoe-shape"

Dpmn83 (talk) 06:30, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]