Jump to content

Talk:Lucy Wills

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lucy Wills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:21, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Coded language, COI

[edit]

Just removed " she was of a generation which had lost a large number of its young men on the Western Front," from the article. Which is code/weasel wording for "not a lesbian." Her sexuality isn't addressed in the limited sourcing, so it won't be addressed by this editor. Most of this article was written by a long-dormant editor whose name indicates he's a member of Ms. Will's family, hence the mention of conflict of interest. The eight year old tag is still very relevant. Tapered (talk) 06:45, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

her name is repeated over and over

[edit]

I came to this article via the Google link. It's an interesting article but Lucy Wills's name is repeated over and over in the text. When men are the subject of articles their full name appears at the beginning but generally they are referred to by their last name in subsequent paragraphs. So for example "John Smith" in introduced as "John Smith" but goes by "Smith" for the rest of the article. Reference to Wills should be the same because otherwise, it just looks silly. It also actually appears sexist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.138.89.122 (talk) 08:49, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. You are welcome to make the changes yourself. Dbfirs 11:02, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't notice this, but you might have to blame her family, and not sexism. See my COI observation above. Regards Tapered (talk) 04:41, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]