Talk:Lucy Heartfilia/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contribs) 09:22, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
This might take up to a week, but I'll try to finish this quickly. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 09:22, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Some preliminary comments: I didn't find any copyright violations, and all links are currently working. More comments to follow in the next few days. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 10:29, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Sorry for the late review, as real-life stuff caught up with me. Here's the review.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
Is there a way to make the Reception section more concise? Per WP:WEIGHT it seems way too long compared to the rest of the article; some trimming might be necessary here. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is there any Japanese discussion about her character? It's fine if there isn't any, but this needs to be clarified first. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
Nomination on hold pending responses to my questions. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
@Narutolovehinata5: Hello and thank you for providing the review. I trimmed the "Reception" section and made the first two paragraphs (which are the longer ones) approximately equal in size. I hope it is all right now. Regarding the Japanese discussion about Lucy's character, all I managed to find was an interview with Aya Hirano — Lucy's Japanese voice actress — written in Japanese, and I added what Hirano said about Lucy to the "Creation and conception" section. Flowerpiep (talk) 20:03, 24 April 2018 (UTC)Flowerpiep
- The reception section is still a bit too long; perhaps it could be made more concise here. My suggestion is, if possible, it could be reduced to about three paragraphs (right now it's four paragraphs long). Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: I organised the "Reception" section in three paragraphs and tried to trim it further. Flowerpiep (talk) 23:20, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Flowerpiep
I'm sorry for the late reply, and I apologize if this GAN has taken so long, but I think there are no more problems with the article, and raised issues have been addressed. As such, I am happy to say that this is a pass. @Flowerpiep:, I suggest you nominate this article over at WP:DYK for the chance for it to be featured on the main page. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:24, 10 May 2018 (UTC)