Talk:Lucić

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Different Lucić families

A Lucić family is present in Novi Bečej since Ottoman times, and another Serbian brotherhood with the same name exist in Brestovac, Negotin, another one in Podlapača (Udbina), another one in Orašac (Aranđelovac).--Zoupan 05:30, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To repeat what I had told you earlier, the poreklo.rs reference for Bečej looks sufficient, assuming Jovan Erdeljanović is still considered reliable. You seem to have misread the one about Podlapača, it lists those Lucić people after describing Croatian immigration. I should mention that I do still find the omission at http://www.poreklo.rs/prezimena-2-2/prezimena-na-slovo-l/?lang=lat strange. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 15:09, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]