Talk:Lúc mới yêu

Vietnam Low‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

On 23 July 2012, it was proposed that this article be moved to Lúc mới yêu. The result of the discussion was page moved.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: pages moved. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:30, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

– 2x Vietnamese pop albums per album artwork and consistency. + 1x recently moved article from Hò khoan Lệ Thủy, which was clearly based on a USA published folk CD titled Hò khoan - Lệ Thủy ("Heave Ho! Lệ Thủy version") but the article and sources are about "Hò khoan!" rowing songs in general, not just those of Lệ Thủy district. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:20, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note, the undiscussed move from Hò khoan Lệ Thủy cannot be restored because the redirect has been edited, but in any case the article isn't about music limited to Lệ Thủy, so it could have been restored to Hò khoan without need of RM. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:32, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support, although it might have been preferable to list the third item separately. The first two seem to be straightforward restoration of diacritics; the third is referred to by that name within the article text itself. — P.T. Aufrette (talk) 05:37, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.