Talk:Loxie & Zoot

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Keep, 8 December 2017, see discussion.
keep, 27 August 2005, see discussion.

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Webcomics.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Loxie & Zoot is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

To Do

Get ISBN. I can quite make out what it says on http://www.clothesfree.com/toons/toonsback.jpg
- ~~I added the ISBN-needed template to talk.~~
- It might be ISBN 0958129908
- I own the book and can varify the ISBN as above, however he sells it from home (presumably) and so won't be found in book stores or librarys
Flesh out cast section. (oooh, really bad pun)

Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 08:34, 2005 August 30 (UTC)

Vote for Deletion

This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 01:32, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Great if it wen't for this page I would not have known of this jewl. Bluefire princess 18:52, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the apeal in this stort of thing. Anubiz ♦ 20:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you referring to the lifestyle or a comic book revolving around it? Either way you'll just have to read the comic I guess. "What if the babies born wearing close?" So cute. Bluefire princess 21:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help

I can't tell is this article about the comics or the title characters? Bluefire princess 21:55, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is supposed to be about the web-comic and as I write this, it is. Nutster (talk) 18:06, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Koala Bares.jpeg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:The Koala Bares.jpeg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 19 May 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:The Koala Bares.jpeg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:11, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Survived second deletion nomination

The article has survived another nomination for deletion back on December 22, 2017. See the discussion here. I just thought I would mention it here. Nutster (talk) 02:19, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion discussion is listed at the top of this page as well ^_^ ~Mable (chat) 20:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]