Talk:Loving Someone/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:30, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Another review for you; I have heard this song quite a lot and definitely like it! --K. Peake 07:30, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
[edit]Recording date is unsourcedDone- "
a jam session using chopped vocal stems," → "a jam session, using a chopped vocal stem,"Done "completing the band's "Paris"." → "completing the band's track "Paris"."Done"is a commentary on" → "is a commentary centred on"DoneRemove pipe on rapsDoneThere are only two music festivals mentioned in the body so write one or more here, plus remove the rainbow lighting part since it's not notable for the leadDone- "and liberal Americans." → "and gay Americans." per the body Not done
- Healy speech in the second para of the "Promotion" section mentions "the left" and "liberals". I feel that changing it to gay Americans" would be a little redundant, since the sentence already mentions the LGBT community. Giacobbe talk 21:52, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
"the band's performances, critcising" → "the band's performances, including ones criticising"Done"due to the strict"→ "due to the" Done
- I think strict is appropriate in this case since the punishment for homosexual acts is death. Giacobbe talk 18:48, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- (CA)Giacobbe Are you sure including this word is not too much detail for the lead? --K. Peake 08:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Kyle Peake: Yes, I am sure. Anti-LGBT laws is a vague term; it encompasses everything from outlawing gay marriage and restricting LGBT couples from adopting, to jail time and death. Highlighting that the laws are “strict” is definitely not too much detail for the lead. However, it is clear that you have a different opinion, so I’m assuming you want it removed before the article is passed. Giacobbe talk 12:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Remove wikilink on United Arab EmiratesDoneAdd info about the synopsis of the video, plus doesn't this belong before the performances in the lead?Done
- The paragraph is organized chronologically, mirroring the format of the "Promotion" section. Giacobbe talk 21:58, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- (CA)Giacobbe This is the lead though so order is different, plus it does not include all promotional info like in the body so move the video accordingly here. --K. Peake 08:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Background and development
[edit]Like in the previous review, I have to ask why is [3] here when the succeeding prose backs up critical and commercial success?Done
- Some reviewers want statements such as the opening sentence to be referenced verbatim. Giacobbe talk 21:19, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
"He began creating the song" → "He allegedly began creating the song" per the sourceDone"to create a piece" → "to write a piece" to be less repetitiveDone"a succinct part was created," → "a succinct part was created thereafter,"Done"from the band's "Paris"." → "from fellow album track "Paris"."Done
Music and lyrics
[edit]Audio sample text looks good, but remove pipe on rappingDone[17] only mentions electronic production and this doesn't work as a source for the genre; I can't access FT but if that only mentions R&B, then move the electronic part to being in the production sentence insteadDone"of four minutes and 20 seconds (4:20)." → "of 4 minutes and 20 seconds (4:20)." per MOS:NUMDoneSplit the information from the commentary onwards into a separate paraDoneRemove pipe on rappingDone[25] should also be after [24] as well as before [26] due to the youth culture partDone"and obsession with" → "as well as an obsession with"Done"while singing "I'm the" → "when singing "I'm the"Done
Release and reception
[edit]Mention what radio station the song was released to in the United Kingdom as a singleDone
- Do artists release singles exclusively to one radio station in the UK? Interesting, I assumed it was a blanket release, as is common in NA. Giacobbe talk 21:36, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
Introduce "Somebody Else" as a fellow album track and start B-side with capitalisationDone- Per The Diamondback not being uni funded, I doubt it violates WP:RSSM
Pipe pop to Pop musicDone"praised "Loving Someone"'s" → "praised the song's"Done"and "melodic sheen" and wrote that it" → "and "melodic sheen", writing that it" to avoid confusion about whether you are referencing the song or those elementsDone"Jarod Johnson II of Paste ranked the song at number 18 on the publication's list of the 1975's essential songs and felt its" → "Paste ranked the song at number 18 on their list of the 1975's essential songs, with Jarod Johnson II feeling its"Done
Promotion and music video
[edit]Retitle to Promotion, as it is ordered chronologically with the video being in the middle of live performances and before promo clothingDone"the band dedicated the song as" → "the band performed the song as"Done"was lit with" → "were lit with"Done- "the band's manager, Jamie Osborn, revealed" → "the 1975's manager Jamie Osborn revealed" Done
- Both versions are grammatically correct. Giacobbe talk 18:26, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- (CA)Giacobbe Change to "the 1975" though, as the most recent instance mentioned them as "the band". --K. Peake 08:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
"did not stand for" → "do not stand for"Done"by Donald Trump's" → "by then-president elect Donald Trump's" with the wikilinkDone"and the US presidential elections for" → "and the presidential election for"Done"all of this shit."" → "all of this shit"." per MOS:QUOTE, unless you add the rest of that sentence from the sourceDone"An accompanying music video for "Loving Someone" was" → "The music video was" per you already having mentioning its existenceDone""washing" over the" → ""wash[ing]" over the" to correctly reword the quoteDone"of the band performing" → "of the 1975 performing"DoneThe part about them uploading should be next to the music video's release date, as that belongs before synopsisDone"In April, the 1975" → "In April 2017, the 1975"DoneUse the term hoodie instead of hooded sweatshirt, as they are not the sameDone"the band, and Healy dedicated" → "the band and Healy dedicated" per British EnglishDone"at Hangout Music Festival" → "at the Hangout Music Festival"Done"objects at the band. The 1975 were" → "objects at the 1975. They were"Done"In August, the band" → "In August 2019, the band"Done"in the country." → "in the United Arab Emirates."Done"to pull the singer off the stage and sought to arrest him." → "to pull the 1975 off the stage and sought to arrest the singer."Done- The endangering of the fan and reasoning behind it being connected to Twitter is unsourced Not done
- The reasoning is not connected to Twitter. Healy endangered the fan, and then faced backlash on Twitter, per the source:
- "...which drew criticism online for potentially endangering the fan involved.."
- "...but reading the reaction on Twitter made him consider..." Giacobbe talk 18:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
"apologised for the "irresponsible" incident but" → "admitted the incident was "irresponsible" but"Done
Track listing and formats
[edit]Retitle to Track listingRemove the streaming and digital download one because that is the album release
Credits and personnel
[edit]- Good
References
[edit]- Copyvio score looks decent at 39.0%
Wikilink Rolling Stone on ref 21Author-link Simon Hattenstone on ref 28Wikilink The Line of Best Fit on ref 33Use the via parameter for YouTube instead on ref 39, plus cite Vevo as publisher
External links
[edit]- Good
Final comments and verdict
[edit]- On hold until all of the issues are fixed; reviewed at a quicker pace today due to not working! --K. Peake 14:07, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, Kyle Peake for the speedy review. I'm glad you enjoyed the song! Giacobbe talk 21:59, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
- @Kyle Peake: I think I’ve addressed all of your remaining comments. Let me know if I’ve overlooked anything! Giacobbe talk 12:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
- @(CA)Giacobbe: ✓ Pass now, this is good but I understand why you did not implement certain changes! --K. Peake 12:39, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.