Talk:Love means never having to say you're sorry
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Love means never having to say you're sorry article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Love means never having to say you're sorry. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Love means never having to say you're sorry at the Reference desk. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Usage
[edit]Needs a section on usage. My Mom's got this phrase on a music box, and I havn't a clue what it means. Kevin 00:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
It means that when someone loves you unconditionally, they love you so strongly that apologies are unnecessary after you screw up and vice versa. I think. 137.99.34.166 (talk) 20:42, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Discourage Trivia Section?
[edit]I don't understand why the powers to be of wiki says they discourage trivia section?
In wiki pages about movies, the trivia section is the one that I find most informative.
What is the rationale behind this rule. Who decides this rule? What for and what's the point? Would that give Wikipedia a "more professional facade"? Is wikipedia struggling to prove itself to have a "more professional facade"? Miamidot 18:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Umm... I think it's because trivia is trivial? In other words if it's the "most informative" it's probably not trivia and should be incorporated into the body of the article. If it's trivial information it is, by definition, not important to the article, and should be deleted. 24.196.67.58 (talk) 20:52, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- I've nuked the list of throw-away parodies of the line, incorporating into the article a few examples that serve as sincere homage or signficant commentary. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 15:15, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Meaning?
[edit]What is actually the meaning of this sentence? Is it that love means never having to say i am sorry because you never hurt your true lover OR is it because there is no need to say "i am sorry" in a true relationship between lovers? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.172.47.10 (talk) 00:57, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
- It's supposed to mean the latter. Which is why it's so widely ridiculed. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 15:16, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Name of MacGraw's Character
[edit]As I see it, the name of MacGraw's character is Jennifer Cavilleri, not Cavalleri, as she herself points out when presented to Oliver's mother. RGWPTC (talk) 11:54, 12 March 2023 (UTC)