Talk:Love and Honor (2006 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Japanese cinema task force.

Japan: Cinema Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 04:14, November 23, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the joint Japanese cinema task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Requested move 3 August 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: First request (Love and Honor → Love and Honor (2006 flim)) moved; Second request (Love and Honor (2013 film) → Love and Honor) not moved. Per consensus below, it has been decided that having Love and Honor as a dab page is the best option. (non-admin closure). ^Ḉɱ̍ 2nd anniv. 01:58, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

– Based on page view stats from the past year or so it's clear that the Japanese film cannot be regarded as the primary topic. Likewise, the more recent American film is pulling in 87% of page views despite having a disambiguated title, so I think there's a reasonable case for making that the primary topic instead. PC78 (talk) 16:47, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'd support Love and Honor (disambiguation) becoming the base article, in lieu of a no-consensus to move the films. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 18:07, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd take that as a fall-back too, but are you ok with the proposed move as-is? PC78 (talk) 22:33, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, happy with the initial nom too. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 18:25, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Lugnut's suggestion is also sensible considering there are 3 topics, and the 2013 film has a bit of WP:RECENTISM going on. Timmyshin (talk) 22:48, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support the proposed move per the page views. kennethaw88 • talk 01:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Partial support, but with the disambiguation page to be moved to Love and Honor, leaving the two films fully disambiguated. --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:47, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support first and oppose second 2601:541:4305:C70:C4D1:215F:39FA:C2EE (talk) 18:52, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lugnuts' suggestion: Love and Honor → Love and Honor (2006 film), Love and Honor (disambiguation) → Love and Honor, and leave Love and Honor (2013 film) where it is. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 05:02, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.