Talk:Love Minus Zero/No Limit/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:10, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:11, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:11, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
There is a problem with ref #17 [1]. This returns a null search page. Better to stick with ref#5 which returns the full list of versions by Dylan and others.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- None used
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
OK, if the ref problem above can be fixed this will pass. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:28, 25 September 2010 (UTC)- Cool, thanks for fixing that, I tried but couldn't. I am happy to promote this. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 03:26, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Thank you for the review. I fixed the link. It is actually the same webpage that could be accessed from ref #5, but this link gets to the covers directly. Rlendog (talk) 03:15, 26 September 2010 (UTC)