Talk:Love: Part Two

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

http://www.alternativeaddiction.com/Review/801

Article Created

Recreated article of a closely upcoming album. Deleted articles will be restored with discretion.DCJodon (talk) 06:03, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections

Thanks for the cleaning up. Included the release date in the summary and corrected the year of chronology. (2010--> 2011). DCJodon (talk) 05:58, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from , 19 October 2011

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The album was leaked today, October 19th 2011.

Spooogey (talk) 20:03, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not a specific request, as required by the template--Jac16888 ^Talk 20:06, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Release date change

no reason to call vandalism on something that is a fact. Love Part 1 and 2 and their movie are all the deluxe, or you can just buy Love part 1 and 2 cd, on November 8th. it is not only on the bands website but their facebook page. www.facebook.com/angelsandairwaves. 2 things VERY easy to check before reverting CORRECT changes someone else made to make this page of their new cd correct inside of simi incorrect by having the wrong release date still posted even after they said they are releasing in 3 days early. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.101.140.125 (talk) 00:12, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you would bother to cite reliable sources when making the edits in the first place, they probably would not get reverted. As usual, the standard is verifiability, not truth. We don't cite facebook or shopping websites; citing the band's website would be fine, though secondary sources are preferred. --IllaZilla (talk) 01:20, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We don't cite shopping websites? The tracklisting is citing amazon as its source, why is it not acceptable to do the same for the release date? ProjectPowerless (talk) 01:29, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The track listing should not be citing Amazon. That needs to be changed to a "reliable, third-party, published source with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy". Allmusic, for example, would be a better source. --IllaZilla (talk) 03:01, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"My Heroine (It's Not Over)"

Has this song title been changed? [1] it says track four is titled "Crawl". Or could of this just been a mistake? --124.183.113.244 (talk) 21:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

But interestingly, the booklet keeps the original name, so something somewhere is a mistake. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.226.226.101 (talk) 12:22, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's interesting we will never know. And as booklet, you're talking about iTunes booklet right? I don't think it has came out in physical CD copy yet. I guess we'll have to wait for the CD release. --124.183.113.244 (talk) 21:36, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was Illazilla's policy to cite something like Allmusic…in which case the current tracklisting should show "My Heroine" since Allmusic shows that, and our current other source is online shopping. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlylemiii (talk • contribs) 06:13, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is not my policy, I merely try to ensure that sources are reliable and that the article content reflects the sources. You're correct about Allmusic, and I'd be fine with changing it as long as that source was cited it. It's the constant back-&-forth switching of titles with little to no explanation that's the problem...stability is important for readers. The album will be on store shelves in a couple of days and the tracklist can be easily verified from the physical copies then. --IllaZilla (talk) 22:19, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just bought the physical copy (on CD). It says on the back, and the lyrics booklet "My Heroine (It's Not Over)". Also track eleven is "All That We Are", not "We Are All That We Are" --124.183.113.244 (talk) 01:56, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Track 11

Both Amazon and iTunes list it as "We Are All That We Are", while every review site has it as "All That We Are". Any idea which one is right? DanielDPeterson + talk 01:59, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have the physical album sitting in front of me (deluxe CD edition with both Parts I & II and the film) and the title for track 11—on the slipcover, on the back of the CD packaging, and in the lyrics booklet—is "All That We Are". Case closed. --IllaZilla (talk) 02:04, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]