This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
I was getting ready to write an article on [Francois Coulon de Villiers]] based on The Order of Canada: Its Origins, History, and Development By Christopher. McCreery relating the same story about him defeating Washington. He was also born in Verchères, Quebec. There are some disparaities (Francois was born in 1712) and my article was going to place him at Fort de Cavagnial near Kansas City in 1744. The cited source here on Louis is very strong. And the source I cited above (available on google books) is also strong. They're probably brothers but I would be appreciate any help on who gets the title of the Washington victor. Thanks. Americasroof22:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I will answer my own question. Louis is the guy that got Washington. Francois is a brother. Various cited sources get them mixed up. I will write a start or stub on Francois. Americasroof23:01, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot07:14, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]