Jump to content

Talk:Lou Rash

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/R/RashLo20.htm

https://www.profootballarchives.com/players/r/rash00200.html

https://www.newspapers.com/image/34120007/?match=1&terms=louis%20rash

https://www.newspapers.com/image/146360001/?match=6&terms=lou%20rash

https://www.newspapers.com/image/146414441/?match=2&terms=lou%20rash

https://www.newspapers.com/image/159612011/?match=1&terms=lou%20rash

https://www.newspapers.com/image/146605668/?match=1&terms=lou%20rash

https://www.newspapers.com/image/623444159/?match=1&terms=lou%20rash

https://www.newspapers.com/image/47552883/?match=1&terms=lou%20rash

BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:45, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Lou Rash/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 00:03, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 15:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


I'll do this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:02, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]
  • Maybe make a note on was also a member of the Pittsburgh Steelers in the NFL and the Saskatchewan Roughriders and Toronto Argonauts in the Canadian Football League (CFL) that although he was on their teams, he never played a game for them?
  • Change about 18 pounds to almost 20 pounds to better summarize the source
  • at the position, and that he no need for the comma
  • You don't need to repeat Canadian Football League since you defined it in the lead
  • and was considered to have impressed early at cornerback, although he eventually was released on June 18 --> and although it was noted he impressed at cornerback, he was released on June 18.
  • Link to Free safety
  • Ref spot check:

Nice work! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:33, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 15:40, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that in his first year in the NFL, Lou Rash was told he was released and began flying back home, but was told upon landing that the release was a mistake and he was to return?
Improved to Good Article status by BeanieFan11 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 266 past nominations.

BeanieFan11 (talk) 23:49, 29 October 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article was nominated seven days after it was promoted to GA so it meets that requirement. No close paraphrasing was found, a QPQ has been done, and the hook is interesting and cited inline. My main concern is that I'm not sure if the article meets WP:DYKCOMPLETE: is there no known information about him after his gridiron football career ended? Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:49, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Narutolovehinata5: WP:DYKCOMPLETE says nothing about having to provide details about every part of a person's life. Parts of a football player's life, such as when they are in elementary school or after their career often aren't notable, and thus not reported on. This does not run afoul of WP:DYKCOMPLETE, which provides the following example: For example, an article about a book that fails to summarize the book's contents, but contains only a biography of the author and some critics' views, is likely to be rejected as insufficiently comprehensive. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:17, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It probably at least violates the spirit of that rule, or at least the "articles that fail to deal adequately with the topic" aspect. I've seen articles in the past that were held for similar reasons. Or at least, that's how I've seen DYKCOMPLETE be implemented in practice. If no information can be found, that's okay, but usually that has to be confirmed first. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:23, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That should work at least. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 22:23, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Added. BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:06, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't the article mention his children by name? They're both in the source provided. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:00, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If I was reviewing this and saw either name in the article, I would yeet them on sight per WP:BLPNAME.--Launchballer 01:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
yeet made me lol Launchballer « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]