Talk:Lotus 108

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"supposedly Chris Boardman’s gold medal winning bike"

Why "supposedly"? 86.136.250.21 (talk) 15:52, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am in contact with the curator at the London Science Museum to confirm if it is indeed Boardman's bike. Will update when I get feedback. Rodrigo Valle (talk) 11:36, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:SSPL 10308019 Comp.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:SSPL 10308019 Comp.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion between models 108 and 110

In several articles i have seen confusion between the model 108 and the much different subsequent model 110. The last model 108 built was in 1992, or possibly early 1993 I Shaun Wallace (cyclist)raced the model 108 at the 1992 world championships, and the model 110 at the 1993 World Chamionships Visually the frames were noticeably different: The 108 had a monoblade fork at the front and back. The 110 did not. The 110 had a horizontal main frame member, and horizontal rear "chainstays" on both sides. the 108 had a sloping main frame member and a monoblade rear wheel support on the right hand side (only) Boardman broke the hour record in 1996 on a model 110 where the forks had been modified to accept supports for out-stretched arms "superman style"

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lotus 108. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110203022022/http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk:80/news/latest/474770/boardman-hands-over-his-lotus-superbike-for-new-liverpool-museum.html to http://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/latest/474770/boardman-hands-over-his-lotus-superbike-for-new-liverpool-museum.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:08, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]