Talk:Lothair II of Italy

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Middle Ages Mid‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Move

This was discussed on a user talk page before. I paste it below:

The change was primarily from "II of Arles" to "II of Italy", but the secondary Lothar to Lothair change was important, too. The 1911 Britannica, the Columbia, Encarta, and the World Almanac (all designed for popular readership) use Lothair. Wikipedia also uses Lothair in all its articles (see Lothair). The old Cambridge Medieval History uses Lothar, as do most modern works it seems. Lothar is the German version of the name, Lothaire is the French, and Lotario is the Italian. I think the modern preference for Lothar is similar to the modern preference for Pippin over Pepin: it indicates the influence of German scholarship in these areas. I have even seen Lothaire in some works. Lothair, not being the correct form in any other language, is surely the proper English form, to be preferred in an encyclopaedic article. In scholarly works, the authors decide whether to use English or non-English forms for reasons known to them. I think the use of Clotaire over Chlothar or any other variant is a poor choice, but at least Wikipedia is consistent in it. I hope this justifies the change to you.

I will defend the move in more depth here, though I take exception to a reversion solely because a defence was not preemptively offered on the discussion page. Firstly, Lothair is the proper English spelling and Wikipedia elsewhere recognises this. Use of Lothar for this specific, entirely non-German individual is incomprehensible. Secondly, in what sense he is "of Arles"? While he is called that because his father was there count, it is solely a byname and has no connection to his ordinal. He was the king of Italy and the second Lothair to be such, therefore he is "Lothair II of Italy". There are several other references for this usage and a simple Google search reveals a few of these that occur online. Srnec 03:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lothair II of Italy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060429224604/http://www.genealogie-mittelalter.de/hugoniden/lothar_koenig_von_italien_950/lothar_koenig_von_italien_950.html to http://www.genealogie-mittelalter.de/hugoniden/lothar_koenig_von_italien_950/lothar_koenig_von_italien_950.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]