Talk:Lost Nigger Gold Mine

A fact from Lost Nigger Gold Mine appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 March 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the legendary Lost Nigger Gold Mine, first discovered in 1887, was still being searched for in 1930?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lost Nigger Gold Mine.

Wikipedia

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

References

All of the references point right back to Wiki articles. That can't be done. I've also removed Bill's nickname, it's not references and can't remain unless sources (per BLP) @-Kosh ► Talk to the Vorlons►Moon Base Alpha-@ 14:40, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you mean by "All of the references point right back to Wiki articles"; the references cite specific pages of the works listed in the article's bibliography. The information you deleted was properly referenced (although I personally can't review it as I lack a JSTOR account), and I can see no justification for your removal of it. Also, adding a {{citation needed}} tag at the top of the article, unattached to any particular statement, is hardly helpful. Deor (talk) 16:33, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per BLP? As far as the article states, Bill is dead.... BLP does not apply. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 16:50, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fake article. All references point to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.251.70.146 (talk) 13:59, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, no. Check the bibliography now. Pelirojopajaro (talk) 18:07, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is this racist?

I don’t think this Is allowed 2600:1007:B11D:9820:F10D:44DC:3AFE:ACD5 (talk) 14:15, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]