Talk:Lost Horizon (1973 film)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
bad rap
[edit]the music was horrible, but the screenplay, acting and sets were all first-class. it's actually a line call which version is better -- shangri-la set and some of the storyline was better in this one; baskul escape and snow scenes were better in the 1937 original, if only for the "magic" of black & white (ideal version would have been oz-style...black and white suddenly changing to colour when they arrived in shangri-la).
the only thing "wrong" with it, really, was those SONGS! i can't BELIEVE bacharach was responsible for that dreck!!
if they'd left those out, it would have been a very very worthy remake. in fact, i am tempted to edit myself a copy along those lines.
does not deserve to be on any "worst films" list. it's really quite good. 209.172.25.14 (talk) 04:09, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lost Horizon (1973 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131206140152/http://blogs.villagevoice.com/dailymusto/2008/03/you_tube_treasu.php to http://blogs.villagevoice.com/dailymusto/2008/03/you_tube_treasu.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:28, 6 January 2018 (UTC)