Talk:Lorton station (Auto Train)

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Virginia: Northern Virginia Low‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Northern Virginia Task Force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Primary topic?

I admit there's not much case for primary topic here, but there are only WP:TWODABS and this was the one with more page views. Readers can find the other through the hat note just as easily as on a two-item dab page. That said, I don't object to disambiguating, but if that happens "Lorton station" can't redirect to a disambiguated title, or else there's no point in the move. It should either become a dab page, or redirect to one.--Cúchullain ^t/c 18:48, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How may page views are there altogether? I don't think either page has significant views anyway, so it doesn't matter. The pageview comparison only works on more popular articles. epicgenius (talk) 19:29, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's harder to say as this one has moved, but until then it got 1112 views in the last 90 days, compared to 492 for the other, so it got over twice the views. Two item dab pages are a bad idea when one article is more prominent, as it sends everyone to a dab page, even though the other article can be distinguished in just as many clicks with a hat note. But yeah, neither article has a huge number of views.--Cúchullain ^t/c 19:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]