Talk:Lord Corporation

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

United States: North Carolina

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina.

Advertising style

I have gone through the article to remove any advertising-like wording. Please read through and make any other recommendations. If there are none, please remove the flag. Thanks

Smbrown123 (talk) 16:33, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I went back and rewrote the article to be neutral. Please consider removing the flag. Thanks! 75.186.44.107 (talk) 20:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

Wow, this article is written from the companies perspective. The refs are almost all the company's site. We need outside sources. Outback the koala (talk) 21:12, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will find more outside sources. Thanks for the input. Smbrown123 (talk) 01:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We have done some major revisions to make sure this article has been written from a neutral point of view. Please remove the flag or tell us where you think the neutrality is compromised. Thank you. Wendyfables (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:48, 4 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Just following up on the status of these changes - please let me know if this is sufficient enough to remove the flags. Wendyfables (talk) 15:31, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the NPOV tag. We don't really need it here at this time. Outback the koala (talk) 17:10, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but the flag that says "this article was written as an advertisement.." is still visible - is there something further that I need to do? Wendyfables (talk) 9:58, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi wendy, I read over the article and i think you're right. It's not really written like an ad, but the history section certainly needs a cleanup to make it an encyclopedic read. I'm going to tag that section only for cleanup and try to help edit myself to get it up to snuf, yknow. Outback the koala (talk) 03:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening - I went back through this and added some articles in the history section to help with the resources - and I saw your changes to the language - thanks! I made a few additional adjustments too. Please take a look and let me know if this is sufficient enough to get the flag removed. Thank you in advance. Wendyfables (talk) 20:39, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Lord Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]