Talk:Look (2009 film)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Too Many Pictures!
[edit]I think the article has too many picture of a single individual. Also, this is not an article about that individual, its about the play, no? Phearson (talk) 21:37, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- I fixed the photos. What is the bias about? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samantha3310 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
- I'm satisfied with the fix. Phearson (talk) 21:47, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. Is there anything else that can be fixed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samantha3310 (talk • contribs) 21:49, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Overcovered
[edit]This article has been overdone with reviews and the like and is dangerously leaving a proper WP:MOS And possibly WP:POV. Phearson (talk) 04:49, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
Is this edit better? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samantha3310 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- Much better, thank you. Phearson (talk) 19:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
File:Theresa Meeker and Alison Parson in Look.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]An image used in this article, File:Theresa Meeker and Alison Parson in Look.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC) |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Look (2009 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120312032603/http://www.accoladecompetition.org/PDF_Winners/WinnersAccoladeDeadline052909.pdf to http://www.accoladecompetition.org/PDF_Winners/WinnersAccoladeDeadline052909.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224124826/http://bestshorts.net/Winners.aspx to http://www.bestshorts.net/Winners.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120531215049/http://thelamovieawards.com/2012_%28II%29__Winners.html to http://thelamovieawards.com/2012_%28II%29__Winners.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:07, 6 January 2018 (UTC)