Talk:Loni Anderson

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Minnesota Mid‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lutheranism Low‑importance

	Loni Anderson is part of WikiProject Lutheranism, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Lutheranism on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to Lutheran churches, Lutheran theology and worship, and biographies of notable Lutherans. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.LutheranismWikipedia:WikiProject LutheranismTemplate:WikiProject LutheranismLutheranism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Plastic

Wow. If you look at the first pic, then go to the third, I think somone might have had a bit too much surgery. That's a terrible pic! I don't remember her looking that bad in So NoTORIous. Donmega60645 18:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Low importance?

Come on. Loni is every bit as important as Burt Reynolds. :) Wahkeenah 17:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Selected filmography

As per Wikipedia is not a collection of lists, I have reduced the "Filmography" section to just the films that have Wiki articles, and renamed it to "Selected filmography" ... people can click the IMDb External link at the end of the article to see the subject's full filmography with links to information about each of their films.

I have also used [[19xx in film|19xx]] tags for the years of the films, something that Some Other Editors do not appear to understand, since they seem to think that just linking [[19xx]] somehow has encyclopedic value.

Anonymous edits without comments may be reverted by anyone.

I am placing this boilerplate message on this Discussion page before I actually make the changes, so that I can just put "see Discussion page" in the edit summary, and hopefully not have my edit summarily reverted as vandalism by Some Other Editor.

Happy Editing! --68.239.79.82 (talk · contribs) 15:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While performing the above mentioned edits, I also renamed and pruned the "Television Work." —68.239.79.82 15:47, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Age

So was she born in 1945 or 1946? For all the small criticisms made on Wikipedia information the major errors go overlooked..You've got two ages listed on the same short page....unlike in an encyclopedia.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.85.198.138 (talk) 14:22, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That seems to be because it is easy to find both years in a Google search. There is even a mention that her birth year has been given to be as late as 1950. What I don't see is a reliable source for her birth year. I have hidden mentions of her birth date in the article until the issue can be resolved in discussion on this talk page. -- Donald Albury 23:38, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say for sure it's 1945, believe me... [1] --Danielvis08 (talk) 21:04, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If someone can figure out what the above primary source is, it would help determine if it is relevant.

From some initial searching, the better quality sources say '45, but I am seeing reliable sources with '46.

Can someone check her autobiography? --Ronz (talk) 02:42, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

was she born "black "

was she born "black " ? http://peculiarbeautyblog.blogspot.ie/2009_01_01_archive.html

As a blog, the source isn't useful here. Additionally, it does not say or imply she was "born 'black'" (whatever that would mean). - SummerPhD (talk) 21:19, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

she's a famous blonde; i'm willing to bet that "born black" here means born "brunette". 66.30.47.138 (talk) 18:20, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plastic#2

Judging from the two pictures currently here, one is from 1992 the other 2012, but apart from a (very slight) change of hairstyle she doesn't look any different. Is her face actually made of plastic? The woman in the newer picture is 67 years old. Surely this is more than just plastic surgery - any mention of what she's done anywhere?--Tuzapicabit (talk) 05:55, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Judging by what is in the article currently it appears the dates on the pictures have been corrected - or pictures changed. Thus, a non-concern since the span is now 7 years and her appearance seems appropriate for that span.THX1136 (talk) 01:17, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]