Talk:Longxi County
(Redirected from Talk:Longxi County, Gansu)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Longxi County article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 22 November 2015
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. The consensus is that this county is the primary topic. Jenks24 (talk) 14:24, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
Longxi County, Gansu → Longxi County – WP:PRIMARYTOPIC per common usage as the only Longxi County in the world. The one in Fujian is completely historical, having been merged in 1960. Timmyshin (talk) 15:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. Natg 19 (talk) 01:07, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose the problem is that Longxi County, Gansu (陇西县) still exists today, and Longxi County, Fujian (龙溪县) has been merged, but for an encyclopedia the old county still is relevant, for example Lin Yutang was born there, Lian Heng's family came from there, and so on. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:15, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support Throughout history hundreds of Chinese counties have disappeared (merged, split up, or renamed). I believe the general practice is to treat the existing ones as the primary topic. -Zanhe (talk) 07:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Support per Zanhe - disambiguation unnecessary —МандичкаYO 😜 12:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.