Jump to content

Talk:Lone Signal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Gliese 526

[edit]

What happened to the entry for Gliese 526? Even the article on Bootes does not list it as a component of that constellation. http://www.astrostudio.org/xhip.php?hip=67155 http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gliese_526 Kortoso (talk) 18:02, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is it AKA GJ 526? Kortoso (talk) 16:52, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Potential dangers and detectability

[edit]

"Various commentators have identified several dangers..." IMHO, "identified" is too strong a word for the actual speculation at hand. Kortoso (talk) 18:05, 3 July 2013 (UTC) The idea that EMR emission poses a threat to a civilization by alerting hostile forces is one of the explanations for the Fermi paradox, so it is not that speculative.--Beliar (talk) 14:55, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I red linked Pierre Fabre. Checkingfax (talk) 04:32, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

what happened to lone signal?

[edit]

Anybody knows what happened to Lone Signal? They appear to be not sending since September. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.104.83.142 (talk) 06:07, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My third and last "beam" was successfully transmitted by Lone Signal on August 13, 2013. Shortly afterwards, Lone Signal announced that it would be ceasing transmission. At the time, there was talk on the website of the possibility of transmitting the beam towards a different target in the sky. Later, there was a post on the Lone Signal website which stated that the project's website had generated only a fraction of the funds required to keep the project going. I wish I had copied the post (since the website and the post are now both gone); but if memory serves, the website was generating only about a quarter of the funds required to keep the project going.Brianhass (talk) 11:20, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Signal Strength / Reception

[edit]

The text says 

For example, the hailing message sent by Lone Signal would be detectable with an array area of 50 
square metres (540 sq ft), and the message portion would be detectable by a telescope with 10 square 
kilometres (3.9 sq mi) of collecting area; by contrast, humanity's most powerful signals, from 
military radars and the Arecibo Observatory, could be detected with a small, 1 square metre (11 sq ft) 
antenna.

I think we need to be a bit more specific. At what distance are we talking about receiving these signals? Mars? Obviously. The Magellanic Clouds? Almost certainly not. At what range do these collection areas stop being viable? *Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 23:34, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Check to see if it's in the cited sources. If not, then it needs to go "bye-bye". Kortoso (talk) 16:48, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Added a "citation needed." I'm not quite ready to remove the claim, as it may come from something not in the citations given but referenced in them. That said, I won't scream if someone else is bolder and yanks 'em. Not that it would matter if I did. =grin=
*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 23:37, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Link to main Lone Signal page broken

[edit]

Spotted at 1:19 17/12/2014 (UTC -03:00) --190.230.55.6 (talk) 04:20, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Lone Signal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lone Signal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lone_Signal&oldid=1201242849"