Talk:London Resort

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Theme Park Wordwide

Can I add theme park Wordwide virtual version of the London Resort from his YouTube channel please as he created a virtual version of the London Resort with official concept art and the official area names. Beanieshark22 (talk) 19:29, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only if a reliable secondary source has written about it. If the only source is the video series itself, it likely doesn't belong in Wikipedia. There are many videos of people recreating things on YouTube, but these don't all get mentioned on Wikipedia. --Lord Belbury (talk) 17:13, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi lord Belbury,

The source is reliable and trustworthy. Theme park Wordwide does use lots of truthful information about the London Resort that isn't mentioned in the article. Beanieshark22 (talk) 17:50, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want, I will pubilish it. If no one likes it, I will take it down and you can block me from editing if you think I'm doing vandalism. Beanieshark22 (talk) 17:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Reliable source" has a special meaning on Wikipedia, click through to the WP:RS page to find out more about that. I don't think these videos are reliable sources for information about the London Resort, and they can't be used as a source for themselves. You'd need to find a newspaper article that had written about the videos, or something like that. --Lord Belbury (talk) 17:58, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rewrite tag

Explanation for the rewrite tag on the article: the article is currently a mix of present and past tense. Since the project appears to be "dead in the water", it should be rewritten to clearly establish that the anticipated project isn't going to happen. Toughpigs (talk) 03:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]