Talk:London Pride (beer)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

CoI

This article, like others on Fuller, Smith, and Turner products, has been subject to blatant Conflict of Interest, with editing by a user named FullerSmithandTurner, as well as a single-purpose account named OrangeMe which has edited only Fuller's Brewery and articles on Fuller's beers. I have cleaned up these articles to some extent but they appear to require continued labelling so that other editors are aware of the CoI and can take action accordingly. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:06, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'm glad you finally bothered to motivate your tagging. Do you think the community will fall in awe of a plain tag? I am not convinced, however, that a user with such a barefaced name would have anything to do with the company as such. Don't you think that their advertising department would be smarter than that? I therefore believe the tag should be removed. Luke (talk) 10:48, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please respect Wikipedia's rules of civility. I believe the tag is absolutely necessary for the reasons stated, which are unfortunately irrefutable; accounts have been abused more than once for this purpose. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:51, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information given on my talk page. I am still confounded why you would not find it necessary to motivate your tag in the first place. I still do not find your assertions proven, and I do not think its my - but your - task to demonstrate evidence for the claims you are making. Luke (talk) 12:58, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please look in the article's history. The evidence is, to repeat, firstly that there was an improper account named FullerSmithandTurner, now rightly blocked for exactly this reason; and secondly, that an SPA named OrangeMe, also as stated above, has repeatedly edited this and other Fuller's accounts, this current year. This is more than sufficient evidence to be certain that a conflict of interest exists. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:11, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The only impropriety I can see, is the name of the account. As I stated above that is not a prima facie evidence of criminal intent; it might as well be an overenthusiastic beer aficionado. When it comes to repeated editing, why should that be construed as a conflict of interest. I am currently repeatedly editing an article about the Dutch navy; does that make me a member of the Koninklijke Marine's communications department? Luke (talk) 18:00, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree, and nor do Wikipedia's administrators. Single-purpose accounts which do nothing except add promotional content favouring a single company's products, with no citations except links to the company's website, are in unambiguous conflict with Wikipedia's neutral point of view. A beer afficionado (and there are many here) would add links to reliable, neutral sources which would impartially evaluate beers from many rival breweries. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:05, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]