Talk:London College of Communication

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alumna status

The entry for the Rebekah Brooks: there is no supporting evidence that I can see. Anyone any further info on this? (Cj1340 (talk) 13:15, 17 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

[1] -- did you make the slightest effort to look? Did looking yourself even occur to you? Nomoskedasticity (talk) 19:12, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

History: Creation and Merging Clarification

1) 1894 Saint Bride Foundation Institute Printing School (aka St. Brides aka St Bride Printing School)
= 1922 London School of Printing and Kindred Trades (aka LSPKT aka London School of Printing aka LSP)

2) 1894 Guild and Technical School
= 1895 Bolt Court Technical School (aka Bolt Court)
= (a) London County Council School of Photoengraving and Lithography (aka London County Council School of Photo-Engraving and Lithography)

3) 1921 the Westminster Day Continuation School
= 1929 School of Retail Distribution
= ???? College of Distributive Trades (aka College for the Distributive Trades, aka CDT)

4) 1929 Printing School (as part of) North Western Polytechnic (aka North Western Polytechnic Department of Printing)

1949 London School of Printing and Graphic Arts (aka LSPGA) <=1 & 2 merge
= 1960(a) or 1962(b) London College of Printing(1) (aka LCP(1))

1969 (4) merges with LCP(1)

5) 1985(b) or 1986(a) The London Institute consisting of:-
LCP (1)
Camberwell School of Arts and crafts
Central School of Art and Design
Chelsea School of Art
College for the Distributive Trades (CDT)
London College of Fashion
St Martin's School of Art)
= 2004 University of the Arts London

1990 London College of Printing and Distributive Trades <=LCP(1) merges CDT
= 1996 London College of Printing(2)
= 2004 London College of Communication

a) http://www.aim25.ac.uk/cgi-bin/vcdf/detail?coll_id=4216&inst_id=41
b) http://www.lcc.arts.ac.uk/about-us/the-college/our-heritage/

QuentinUK (talk) 14:21, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alumni of London County Council School of Photoengraving and Lithography

Salomon van Abbé (artist, etcher)
Edmund Blampied (artist)
Terence Donovan (photographer)
Fougasse (cartoonist)
Joan Hassall (wood engraver)
Paul Nash (artist)
John Nicolson (artist)
Sukumar Ray (poet)

Employees Albert Angus Turbayne (book designer)
Captain Vincent Brooks and William Day (lithographists)

QuentinUK (talk) 15:14, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on London College of Communication. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:03, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20110822033528/http://www.lcc.arts.ac.uk/about-us/ and https://web.archive.org/web/20121215041540/http://www.lcc.arts.ac.uk/about-us/the-college/our-heritage/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:02, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest editing

More than one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting {{request edit}} (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request. Requests that are unduly long, or are not supported by independent reliable sources, are unlikely to be accepted.

Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:03, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cutbacks and closures

Could there be something on what has happened in the decade following the 2011 investigation. Jackiespeel (talk) 16:43, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Is it actually relevant to the entry?

What is the wiki policy in this case? Postconfused (talk) 19:08, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]